Statement from President Peter George on Freedom of Speech

default-hero-image

Universities have a fundamental role in our society. They educate, they create new knowledge and they provide opportunity. These goals can only be accomplished if certain fundamental principles are upheld. The most important of these principles are academic freedom and freedom of speech.

Over the past few weeks McMaster's commitment to these principles has been the subject of debate as the University community has dealt with questions surrounding Israeli Apartheid week prompted by incorrect information that the University has banned the use of the term Israeli Apartheid on campus.

Let me be categorically clear. The term has not been banned. McMaster's commitment to freedom of speech has not been compromised.
It is encouraging to see the passion that many have relayed in messages on this subject because the protection of freedom of speech should not be taken lightly. I take it seriously and so should everyone else at the University.

But while we defend freedom of speech we must also remember the responsibility that comes with it. Each of us is responsible for speaking, writing and acting with respect for those who may have a different view. We are all responsible for promoting tolerance and meaningful dialogue that focuses on productive discussion and encourages people to be part of the debate in a safe and supportive environment.

Every member of the McMaster community is charged with demonstrating tolerance and respect for each other and for our campus. As a community we expect no less from everyone who visits McMaster.

It is unfortunate that considerable incorrect information has circulated on the Internet and that some, in many cases from outside the University, have seen it as an opportunity to advance their own causes. They demonstrate little or no regard for the facts or true interest in what really occurred or more precisely did not occur at the University. Anyone with such an agenda may say they are acting in defense of freedom of speech but in reality they only believe in freedom of disinformation.

We have a choice. We can let the current issue create divisions on campus or we can choose to unite with a common voice that the fundamental principles of freedom of speech and academic freedom will not be compromised and that through respect and tolerance will in fact be strengthened.

The McMaster I have known for the past 43 years falls clearly on the side of academic freedom and free speech and together we can ensure that such a proud legacy continues to flourish.